Responding to Crisis with Hope: Students, Families & Community Organize for Racially Just Relationship-Centered Community Schools Across California

Acronym Cheat Sheet
- Alliance for Boys and Men of Color = ABMoC
- California Community Schools Partnership Program = CCSPP
- California Department of Education = CDE
- California Partnership for the Future of Learning = CA PFL
- Local Education Agency = LEA
- Multi-Tiered System of Supports = MTSS
- Request for Application = RFA
- State Board of Education = SBE
- Technical Assistance = TA
In 2020, as the COVID-19 pandemic began, we saw a crisis emerge. Schools across California closed down in response to COVID-19 and students and families lost access to schools as critical hubs of connection, community resources, and learning. This was experienced most acutely by low-income students and families of color. Members of the California Partnership for the Future of Learning responded by conducting a listening campaign with allies from across the state. This listening campaign included more than 20 grassroots education and racial-justice organizations who heard from over 600 students and families from low-income communities of color in more than 20 school districts.
The need for mental health support, accompanied by a sense of belonging and strong relationships, for access to equitable learning opportunities, and for engaging students and families as equal partners in decision-making emerged as key issues.
As a result of this listening campaign, the CA PFL began to shift focus to prioritize increased funding for transformative, racially just and relationship-centered community schools. Students, families, community, and educators developed a policy platform, which aligned with the core pillars and approach of community schools. The pandemic exposed decades of long-standing racialized systemic inequities in education with resulting gaps in opportunity and academic outcomes. However, where families, students, educators, and community built relationships and partnered, schools were better able to support students and adults alike through the crisis. Students, families, community, and educators called on policy makers to expand racially just, relationship-centered schools—which center shared power and decision-making with students, families, educators, and community to heal from the pandemic and transform the future of California.
As one Oakland student shared “We can’t go back to normal. Normal wasn’t working for a lot of people, especially students of color. We must work together with decision-makers to create a school where we are comfortable and can succeed. I don’t want to go back to a classroom, I want to go back to a community.”
Students, families, and community organizers across California leveraged decades of organizing, advocacy, and research to turn the crisis of the pandemic into an opportunity to address the impacts of intergenerational divestment and structural racism in education and move towards their transformative vision of an educational system built for us all. They spoke at legislative hearings and met with policy makers to advocate for equitable investments in transformational, relationship-centered community schools.
For example, student and family leaders, organizers and advocates honored Memorial Day 2020 by testifying at the Senate Education Budget Committee. Judith Mendez, a Spanish speaking mother of two and PICO CA Education for Liberation leader from Oakland, called on legislators “to ensure that equity is a reality, not just in words, but in action.” Jamila Rice, a youth organizer with Calfornians for Justice in Long Beach lifted the importance of investing in community schools “that provide health care to families, have smaller class sizes, that help parents learn new skills - schools that prioritize relationships with students, schools that nurture relationships with students who are arriving in this country for the first time.”
On June 29, 2020, the Governor and legislature responded by investing $45 Million in grants for sustaining or expanding community schools.
Memorial Day 2020 was also the day of George Floyd’s murder. Communities in California, across the US, and around the world expressed their pain and outrage through taking public action. The racial uprisings following the murder of George Floyd and the ongoing trauma associated with racialized killings, continued to expose the impacts of the systemic racism permeating our society. This further highlighted the critical role community schools can play in healing children and young people and transforming schools and communities. Students, families, organizers, educators, and advocates responded by elevating the urgent need for schools in every community in California to become racially just and relationship-centered community schools.
Fueled by the impacts of the dual pandemics of COVID-19 and systemic racism, families, students, community organizers and advocates across California were spurred to organize and advocate for much greater transformative investments in Black and Brown children and youth. They shifted from advocating for millions to advocating for BILLIONS of dollars in increased funding for community schools.
In June 2021, this advocacy/organizing effort contributed to an historic investment, as Governor Newsom and the California Legislature approved $3 billion in one-time community schools grant funding over 7 years.
Following the approval of the budget in June 2021, students, families, organizers and advocates shifted the focus to organizing and advocating to support strong and equitable implementation of the California Community Schools Partnership Program (CCSPP). While securing the budget allocation was an historic milestone, it was just the first step. Low-income students and families, community partners, and educators knew from experience the importance of impacting the development of the CCSPP at every level - from the school site, to the district, to the state to ensure that their vision for transformative racially just and relationship-centered community schools becomes a reality for students in thousands of schools across California.
The goal was for students, families, and communities to inform and impact the new statewide California Framework, Planning and Implementation, and Lead and Regional Technical Assistance Center grants for the CCSPP. In August 2021, the CA PFL joined with the Alliance for Boys and Men of Color (ABMOC) , and allied organizers, advocates, and community partners from across the state to exchange ideas about how to ensure strong implementation of the CCSPP. This included impacting the development of the new California Community Schools Framework, and the Requests for Applications for Planning and Implementation grants, and the Lead and Regional Technical Assistance Centers.
In November and December of 2021, the CA PFL and ABMoC supported six California Department of Education-hosted regional community schools forums to ensure they were an effective vehicle for students, families, community members, and educators to impact the development of the California Community Schools Framework.
More than 600 students, families, educators, advocates, and community members took part in six virtual multilingual community schools forums organized by geographic region. Participants heard presentations and shared their experiences, hopes and dreams, and program recommendations in Arabic, English, Purepecha, and Spanish.
Forum participants heard an overview of the CCSPP, followed by presentations from student, family, and educator leaders about opportunities and challenges in their regions. Participants then came together in small groups for facilitated conversations to share their hopes, concerns, priorities, and wisdom about what makes an excellent community school, and what is standing in the way of realizing that vision. Following the forums, the CA PFL and ABMoC consolidated the community recommendations into a report and advocacy letter with broad support from 57 allied organizing and advocacy groups from across California.
Students families, and community identified six essential priorities or components for successful, racially just community schools:
- Nothing About Us Without Us: Students and families must have an equal and respected voice in decision making at the school site and district levels. multi-interest holder shared decision-making teams must reflect the diversity of the community and include directly impacted students and their families, especially those that are under-resourced and under-represented - along with educators, support staff, administrators, and community partners.
- Solutions that are collaboratively developed and broadly held are more sustainable over time.
Create and support a culture and practice of authentic relationships, centered on supporting students and grounded in cultural humility, mutual respect, and a commitment to engage as informed and equal partners; this includes capacity building for educators and staff.
- Support culturally rooted programs and curricula that foster racially just schools. Provide capacity building and support for staff, particularly aimed at anti-racist pedagogy and practice.
- Recruit, hire, and retain diverse, multilingual, multi-racial, staff who reflect the diversity of the communities they serve.
- Inspire students through experiential and project-based learning, the arts, music, and outdoor learning connected to the community.
- Move from criminalization to connections: Prohibit the use of funds for school police, criminalization and exclusionary practices, and school hardening.
- Commit to implementing restorative and transformative justice practices and culturally rooted programs that promote racial equity and healing.
- Partner with diverse community organizations that have expertise in student, family, and community engagement; racial equity; school climate; culturally rooted teaching and learning; and school transformation to provide Technical Assistance (TA) and coaching. Multi-interest holder shared decision-making school teams should be able to choose coaches and TA providers who are best equipped to support their specific needs
- Provide integrated mental health, wellness, and healing-centered supports that are culturally rooted and destigmatized.
Below are the statewide and regional handouts outlining the shared priorities for community schools identified by students, families, educators, advocates, and community members in the forums (PDFs):
Students, families, organizers, and advocates continued to write letters, participate in State Board of Education meetings, legislative and budget hearings, and meet with policymakers, including representatives of the Department of Finance and Governor’s office, the Legislative Analyst's Office, Legislative Budget Committee chairs, members and staff, the State Board of Education, the California Department of Education, and members and staff of the Senate and Assembly. As a result, many of the community’s recommendations have been incorporated into the CA Community Schools Framework, adopted in January 2022, the Planning, Implementation, and Lead Technical Assistance Center Grant RFAs released in February and March 2022, and the Regional Technical Assistance Center RFA released in July 2022.
On May 18, 2022, the State Board of Education (SBE) approved over $664 million in grants to establish new and expand existing community schools.
Meanwhile, students, families, and communities continued to organize and advocate to expand the investment in community schools and secure changes to the State of California’s Education Code to support strong implementation of their vision for racially just, relationship-centered community schools.
In June 2022, the legislature and Governor approved an additional $1.1 billion investment in community schools. This investment will be critical to ensuring that CCSPP resources are made available to more communities, especially those who have been most deeply under-resourced over decades.
They also approved changes to the CCSPP in California’s Education Code to better align with the community’s values and vision for transformative community schools by:
- Prohibiting using community school funds for law enforcement and punitive practices;
- Prioritizing community schools grants for districts that share decision making with students, families, educators and community partners; and
- Supporting schools and districts to co-create and continuously improve community schools by requiring their shared decision-making teams–inclusive of students, families, community partners and educators–to provide annual public reports and presentations of their learnings and plans.

Community Priority
Power-sharing with students, families, educators, and community partners:
- Nothing About Us Without Us: Students and families must have an equal and respected voice in decision making at the school site and district levels. Multi-interest holder shared decision-making teams must reflect the diversity of the community and include directly impacted students and their families, especially those that are under-resourced and under-represented - along with educators, support staff, administrators, and community partners.
- Solutions that are collaboratively developed and broadly held are more sustainable over time.

What We We’ve Won in the CCSPP Framework, Ed Code & CCSPP Grant RFAs and Deliverables
- Grants are prioritized for schools and districts that:
- “Involve pupils, parents, certificated and classified school staff, and cooperating agency personnel in the process of identifying the needs of pupils and families, and in the planning of support services to be offered.” (Ed. Code Sec. 8902(f)(3)).
- “Identify…a mechanism for sharing governance, which may include a plan to use existing or create shared decision making teams that include pupils, families, educators, and community-based organizations…” (Ed. Code Sec. 8902(f)(6)).
- In the 2022-23 implementation grant RFA pages 8-9, CDE encouraged “all applicants to include schools meeting qualification thresholds” in their application. This includes schools meeting many priority criteria who serve other high-need student groups, such as Black and indigenous students and students with disabilities, who are not part of the LCFF unduplicated student groups (English learners, foster youth, students from low-income households).
- Implementation grantees “shall annually report and publicly present their community school plans, including data and outcomes from the prior year, at the schoolsite and at a meeting of the governing board of the school district, county board of education, or the governing body of the charter school. Implementation grant recipients shall publicly post their community school grant application and community schools plan on the local educational agency’s internet website.” (Ed. Code Sec. 8902(h)(6)).
- This was further expanded in the 2022-23 implementation grant RFA, pages 15-16: “Grantees shall annually report and publicly present their community school plans, including data and outcomes from the prior year, at the school site and at a meeting of the LEA’s governing board. The presentations should be developed with and presented by each school’s CCSPP shared decision-making team or council.”
- The CCSPP Framework includes a Commitment to Shared Decision Making and Participatory Practices among the four cornerstone commitments that are “essential components to all California community schools.” According to this commitment, “All school interest holders including students, families, staff, and community members must have genuine engagement in decision making about school climate, curriculum, and services. Shared decision-making practices must also prioritize transparency and shared accountability to ensuring information is both available and accessible, so that all interest holders can fully participate.” (CCSPP Framework, p. 7)
- 2022-23 Implementation Grant RFA, Community Schools Implementation Plan, page 31: “Applicants are required to submit an Implementation Plan for each applying school site.” Implementation plans should include a description of “the schools’ commitment to implement core principles, including the Cornerstone Commitments (e.g., Shared Decision Making and Participatory Practices) identified in the Framework.”
- Planning grantees moving into implementation and first time implementation grantees from LEAs with existing community schools must demonstrate having shared decision-making teams in place.
- 2022-23 Implementation Grant RFA, Community Schools Artifacts, page 32: “CCSPP Shared Decision-Making Council (or comparable governance body): Applicants should submit documents reflecting the Council Roster and Meeting Minutes from at least two meetings during the 2022–23 school year. Applicants may submit both LEA and school-site level roster and minutes, but there must be council rosters for each school site included in the LEAs application.”

Community Priority
Trusting relationships and communication form the foundation
- Create and support a culture and practice of authentic relationships, centered on supporting students and grounded in cultural humility, mutual respect, and a commitment to engage as informed and equal partners; this includes capacity building for educators and staff.

What We We’ve Won in the CCSPP Framework, Ed Code & CCSPP Grant RFAs and Deliverables
- Engagement with students, family, schoolsite staff, and community is a pillar of community schools. This may include home visits, home-school collaboration, culturally responsive community partnerships to strengthen family well-being and stability, and school climate surveys. (Ed. Code Sec. 8901(b)(2)).
- Implementation grant funds may be used for “Designing and executing educator, family, pupil, and community engagement strategies.” (Ed. Code Sec. 8902(h)(1))D)).

Community Priority
Trusting relationships and communication form the foundation
- Create and support a culture and practice of authentic relationships, centered on supporting students and grounded in cultural humility, mutual respect, and a commitment to engage as informed and equal partners; this includes capacity building for educators and staff.

What We We’ve Won in the CCSPP Framework, Ed Code & CCSPP Grant RFAs and Deliverables
- Engagement with students, family, schoolsite staff, and community is a pillar of community schools. This may include home visits, home-school collaboration, culturally responsive community partnerships to strengthen family well-being and stability, and school climate surveys. (Ed. Code Sec. 8901(b)(2)).
- Implementation grant funds may be used for “Designing and executing educator, family, pupil, and community engagement strategies.” (Ed. Code Sec. 8902(h)(1))D)).

Community Priority
Inclusive, safe and police-free schools
- Move from criminalization to connections: Prohibit the use of funds for school police, criminalization and exclusionary practices, and school hardening.
- Commit to implementing restorative and transformative justice practices and culturally rooted programs that promote racial equity and healing.

What We We’ve Won in the CCSPP Framework, Ed Code & CCSPP Grant RFAs and Deliverables
- Funds are prohibited from being used for punitive disciplinary practices or engaging campus law enforcement. (Ed. Code Sec. 8902(b)(2)).
- The CCSPP Framework includes a Commitment to Racially Just and Restorative School Climates among the four cornerstone commitments that are “essential components to all California community schools.”... “The commitment explicitly expects the presence of restorative practice rather than punitive, exclusionary discipline that detaches students from school and from needed supports, too often activating a school to prison pipeline. Such punitive disciplinary practices are inconsistent with this commitment and run counter to the spirit and intent of the CCSPP Framework.” (CCSPP Framework, Page 6)
- 2022-23 Implementation Grant RFA, Community Schools Implementation Plan, page 31: “Applicants are required to submit an Implementation Plan for each applying school site.” Implementation plans should include a description of “the schools’ commitment to implement core principles, including the Cornerstone Commitments (e.g., Racially Just and Restorative School Climates) identified in the Framework.”

Community Priority
Schools need more resources and diversity to reflect the communities they serve
- Partner with diverse community organizations that have expertise in student, family, and community engagement; racial equity; school climate; culturally rooted teaching and learning; and school transformation to provide Technical Assistance (TA) and coaching.
- Multi-interest holder shared decision-making school teams should be able to choose coaches and TA providers who are best equipped to support their specific needs.

What We We’ve Won in the CCSPP Framework, Ed Code & CCSPP Grant RFAs and Deliverables
- Grants are prioritized for schools and districts that: “Plan to support a network of site-based community schools at schoolsites that have the capacity to ensure that services, professional development, and engagement can occur on schoolsite, or at an adjacent location, with the support of community-based organizations and other relevant providers, for all relevant stakeholders. (Ed. Code Sec. 8902(f)(7)).
- 2022-23 Implementation Grant RFA, Community Schools Artifacts, page 32: “Community Asset Mapping and Needs/Gap Analysis: Applicants should submit documents showing evidence of asset mapping and gap analysis projects for each school included in the application. Applicants may submit project summaries, but should show evidence of key interest holder involvement with the project.”